No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
No items found.
Endorsed
*This resource has been tested for appropriateness in the classroom and scrutinised for safeguarding and cybersecurity issues. However, please do carry out any due diligence processes required by your own institution before using or recommending it to others.
Experimental
*This is an example of a resource that is under development and may not have been fully vetted for security, safety or ethics.  Please carry out your own safeguarding and cybersecurity due diligence before using it with students or recommending it to others.

Shape of the Future: How System Leaders Can Respond to the Provocations of Artificial Intelligence.

Primary
Secondary
Sixth Form
Specialist
Pupil Referral Unit
No items found.
Leadership & Implementation
Key Stage 2
Key Stage 3
Key Stage 4
Key Stage 5
Key Stage 1
No items found.
Documents
No items found.
No items found.
Practitioners Panel
Advisory Panel

This report is the culmination of a project bringing together leaders from a group of Multi Academy Trusts (MATs) and families of schools who collectively represent the leadership of 413 schools, approximately 32,000 staff and ¼ million young people across England. It is designed for those involved in school-specific system leadership, including the many stakeholders working within and around schools to support a safe, purposeful and intelligent approach to the use of AI by young people and the schools workforce. It provides: A structure to guide school and group leaders as they navigate their way through responding to the many provocations and considerations raised by AI. A series of insights and recommendations from school leaders at the very front of conversation in this space.

Key findings and recommendations include:

1. Strategic Approach: MATs should develop clear AI strategies aligned with their educational vision, addressing governance, safeguarding, and ethical considerations.

2. AI Literacy: There is a pressing need for comprehensive AI awareness and literacy training for all stakeholders, including students, staff, families, and policymakers.

3. Curriculum and Assessment: The integration of AI necessitates a review of curriculum content and assessment methods, with a focus on developing critical thinking and AI literacy skills.

4. Equity and Access: MATs should address potential digital divides and aim to ensure equitable access to AI technologies across all schools and student populations.

5. Staff Development: Ongoing professional development is crucial to equip education stakeholders with the skills to effectively address the opportunities and risks associated with AI.

6. Ethical Considerations: Robust frameworks are needed to address data privacy, bias in AI systems, and the ethical use of AI in education.

7. Research and Evaluation: MATs should conduct and participate in ongoing research to evaluate the impact of AI on learning outcomes and teaching practices.

8. Collaboration: Enhanced cooperation between MATs, educational bodies, and technology providers is recommended to share best practices and develop standardised approaches to AI implementation.

The report also includes a set of practical actions that system leaders can take together to support the effective integration of AI into education.

Practical actions include:

1. Advocate for and support the development of a centralised repository for Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) specific to educational technology tools.

2. Develop a comprehensive AI governance strategy addressing children's rights, data protection, and safeguarding in the evolving educational technology landscape.

3. Participate in the upcoming curriculum review to champion the integration of AI education across all educational stages.

4. Support the creation of a national working group to identify MAT functions that could benefit from AI.

5. Actively engage with media partners to ensure nuanced and accurate coverage of AI in education.

6. Engage with marketplace solutions and supplier associations to advocate for improved filtering and quality assurance mechanisms for AI-related educational products.

This report serves as a starting point for system leaders to develop comprehensive strategies for AI integration, aiming to create learning environments that prepare students for success in an increasingly AI-driven world while maintaining the core values of education.

Key Learning

Risks

The report emphasises that while AI offers significant potential to enhance educational practices, its integration must be approached thoughtfully and responsibly. MATs must balance technological innovation with the fundamental human aspects of education, ensuring that AI enhances rather than replaces crucial human interactions in the learning process.

The findings underscore the need for a nuanced, context-sensitive approach to AI integration, recognising that there is no one-size-fits-all solution. As the education sector navigates this complex landscape, ongoing multi-stakeholder collaboration, research, and adaptation will be essential to harness AI's potential whilst addressing its challenges.